Manage your books online with aNobii.

Manage your books online with aNobii.I’m starting this post a little late tonight because I’ve spent the last few hours playing around with a new Web app I found on the lifehack blog today. It’s called aNobii, and it’s an online database designed to help you manage, track, and share your reading library. Apparently there are other sites like aNobii, but this is the first I’ve learned about them. I remember a site a long time ago (the name escapes me) that let users list their books and swap them with other users (which is a feature in aNobii, as well), but it didn’t have the levels of functionality that aNobii does.

How it works: you enter your books, either by ISBN or title, and they are added to your “shelf.” You can make your shelf public in order to start discussions, get recommendations, and meet like minded people. Or you can choose to have your shelf remain private, though I’m not sure why you’d do that. The community has a very diverse, international flavor, and it would be a shame not to take advantage of that.

Once I signed up, I started grabbing armfuls of books from the other room and entering them in the database. It took me about 45 minutes to enter 100+ books. There is also an option to import your existing book list from other sources. You can assign ratings, add comments, and specify if you have finished the books or not. The interface is intuitive and fast — one of the fastest dynamic Web sites I’ve ever used. And speed is key here, because aNobii’s core audience is going to be folks with hundreds of books they’ll want to upload and share.

Once you get your books on your shelf, the social networking aspect of the site comes into play. You can see how many other users have the same books or similar shelves as you do. You have access to discussions about your books and targeted recommendations based on the content of your shelf. And, as I alluded to above, you can designate certain of your books for trading.

Because I just signed up this evening, I haven’t had a chance to try out the trading feature. But it works like this: users create Wish Lists of books they want to read, and aNobii matches the books on your list with books that other users have designated for trading. I’m not really sure how it’s a trade unless you’re trading for money. I think this feature needs some refining before it’s really viable (the very young community needs to grow, too).

Another cool feature of the Wish List portion of the site is how aNobii allows you to customize the Amazon referral links. You can choose between all of the different international Amazon stores, and you can specify which currency to display prices in. For example, I have the Japanese, British, Canadian, and American Amazon stores listing prices in US Dollars for books on my wishlist. When I’ve purchased items from Amazon UK and Amazon Canada in the past, I realized what a pain it is to convert the currency. So I think this is a welcome feature.

Overall, aNobii looks like a very promising Web 2.0 app. I’m a pretty big bibliophile. I have a degree in English, and I worked in a book store for seven years. aNobii was pretty much made for me, and it looks like I’ll be spending even more time there in the next few days.

If you’re interested, you can visit my shelf and be amazed at how many books I own and haven’t read.

Leave a Response / Trackback

6 Responses to “Manage your books online with aNobii.”

  1. Jason Stubblefield says:

    03/27/07 at 11:32 pm

    If you want to play with another up and coming web 2.0 app, try Geothingy , a user edited local search engines. Users can request a login to help edit the list of urls used by the crawler to build the index. The idea is that a group of human editors pre-filter the results to get rid of spam and irrelevant urls.

  2. Robert says:

    03/28/07 at 8:34 am

    I think I’ve mentioned this to you before, but I’ll mention it here since it is somewhat related.

    Delicious Library (http://www.delicious-monster.com/) is a program that seems similar to your aNobii in some ways. It is designed around the idea of cataloging your stuff moreso than the idea of sharing it through the web. Nonetheless, it is cool and does some interesting things.

    To scan your books (or CDs or DVDs or Video Games), you take a webcam, like Apple’s iSight, and wave it over the barcode. Then DL checks a database and brings up tons of information about the item. Things like, price new, last auction price, # of pages, some reviews, mini bio, etc. Pretty cool.

    It also stores them as a graphical library representation, kind of like your site only a bit more compact.

    I think the guys who did this (a few years ago) were very clever in their use of the camera to speed the input process up. I also think this kind of application demonstrates the potential of web services in a thick client type application. They query Amazon’s web services with ISBN number to get some of the data and the images. They might do the same with eBay or a number of other sites if they chose to do so.

    Part of my point is that, while Web 2.0 provides nice frontends with a bunch of cool features, that it is the data & information that is exposed and how you use it that makes these applications (web or otherwise) innovative and useful.

    By the by, I love that Top Ten is on your front page. Such a great comic.

  3. Rob says:

    03/28/07 at 1:39 pm

    @Jason - I’ll check it out. Thanks for the comment!

    @Robert - That’s a great idea to use a webcam to scan barcodes. If you can export your Delicious Library list to a spreadsheet or an Amazon list, you can import it into aNobii.

    I agree that information is key, but community is just as important with Web 2.0. Information provides a context to build community (in this case, lists of books), and the community, in turn, grows the mass of information. It’s up to Web 2.0 applications to manage the information and foster the community.

    Thick client apps have always been dynamic when it comes to managing data on your desktop (some more innovative than others), but the real step forward in Web 2.0 is the inclusion of other users into the equation.

  4. Robert says:

    03/28/07 at 2:40 pm

    Well, a huge issue with community in the Web 2.0
    world is trust. Trust of the content and intentions of the user(s) is a big deal because of the potential for the poisoning of the well of information. Think about wikipedia. Should people trust it as a source? The hard answer is no. I think this is a major issue that must be resolved before new web technologies take off. There will always be a group of early adopters but their adoption of a technology (or even an idea) does not make it successful (read the Tipping Point, by Malcolm Gladwell who treats this subject well).

    This may be personal, because obviously I have tremendous issues with trust.

    Blogs like this are part of the community aspect you are talking about. But they are also part of the information integration aspect, as I am talking about. Readers of this blog have access to new info, things get tied together.

    I think we might be talking about different types of information as well, but that’s a different discussion.

    Also, I don’t like the statement that Web 2.0 applications manage the information.

    I also worry about privacy a lot. Prospective employers read your Myspace page, do google searches on you. They may find out you like to go to a party occasionally and not hire you because of that, when in reality that shouldn’t be a factor.

    Another issue is how does this proliferation of information affect our ability to get what we need.

    After re-reading the stuff I’ve put down, it seems that I’m not on the side of “Web 2.0″. Can I get a definition of Web 2.0?

  5. Rob says:

    03/28/07 at 9:18 pm

    Yes, your lack of trust has been well documented. My only counter to the lack of trustworthy information argument is to say that users have to exercise good judgment when doing business or conducting any important online transaction.

    But the same applies to real world contexts. For example, when you go to buy a car, are the salespeople trustworthy? They have a lot of information about their cars and some about their competition, but are they reliable sources of information about cars? No, because they have an agenda. And it’s our job as consumers to do our due diligence and ferret out the truth. Same applies on the Web. Should we trust Wikipedia? Maybe not, but a lot of times it’s a good place to start. And there’s a whole Internet of resources to confirm or debunk information found there. But, as in life, eventually you’ll have to decide to trust something, whether it’s Wikipedia or the New York Times or the Bible. The buck has to stop somewhere.

    I’ve heard stories about employers using information they’ve gathered from these social networking sites to evaluate candidates. But eventually, these businesses are going to have to face the fact that an enormous percentage of their future work force is living a very active life on the Web. Granted, the choices that young folks make about what they include in their Web-life are subject to bad judgment, but they’ll learn. We’re all learning. All of this Web 2.0 stuff is still so new; customs and modes of behavior are still being developed. And while you look at the movement askance, I’m buying into it wholeheartedly. (This is the reason you should have a blog: so you can offer a counterpoint to all the positive Web 2.0 blogs out there. Be our voice of reason, Robert!)

    For the definition of Web 2.0, I’ll point you to this article by Tim O’Reilly that really got the movement going (this is the third time I’ve pointed this out to you, btw).

  6. one thing new » blog archive » Learning 2.0 and the kcls27things project. says:

    03/29/07 at 8:29 pm

    […] My friend Robert and I have been discussing the merits and drawbacks of Web 2.0 technologies in the comments section of a couple of my recent posts. I’m buying into it whole hog, while he has some pretty severe […]

leave a reply